Yet, they were able to make a huge impact on the independence of those they spoke out for and infect the world with the idea of non-violence a. People who starts war just for their gains are the ones who are responsible.
Sort of embarassing when you think about it. Terrific pressure is being put on the President and Congress to investigate and punish those who are guilty of instigating the unnecessary war, and of later making foolish and criminal decisions as to conduct of the war.
Its not just whether to do something, its how too. Overpumping has caused a lot of problems with the premature aging of their oil fields.
One of the ways is the self-defence part as mentioned in post 8. It is the only way we have a chance that people might intervene. I think in the current environment, we are confronted with a religious movement where people feel it is justified by God to kill young women who are seeking higher education.
Proper Authority is first: These are cheaper, much more humane ways of solving these problems than going and attacking other countries, crossing our fingers, and hoping for the best.
The argument that the goal is worthy and that war is the best option for pursuing it should be strong enough to garner considerable domestic and international support. That would Is war justified or not a Jesus Christ. Okay I want to go to the last segment which is the inter-questioning. They force their cynical views about war and humanity upon them, they tell the that it's naive t wish for peace,that it's naive to work towards mutual understanding, in the end they corrupted an idealistic mind into another hopeless cynic, who's only goal in life is to keep spoiling themselves til death, they corrupted hope for the future into into a bitter acceptance of the present, ignoring the fight for change,ignoring the ideals that humanity should follow, in favor of following the easy path, the path of apathy, the path of greed but most of all the path of conflict.
Are you in favor of abolishing the U. That is probably not going to happen. Seriously, they meant nothing to us. For most of our history we justified war as defensive based on attacks on America or her assets. Who would blame them for not forgiving u.
Do you think the people in Hotel Rwanda would have been there if they could have just gotten out of the country when they saw the writing on the wall? Yes, there are absolute morals. I have no problem killing one to save thousands.
We can and will do anything we want. People are obsessed with the here and now, what they can see, what they perceive as real but that isn't productive. How would he handle the responsibility? Naive soldiers and media poisoned teenagers always say there is a greater good soldiers are fighting for, but the soldier I met disagrees, he said he joined the military because he had no choice, that it was the only way he could afford an educaton and to support his family.
A study of events leading to a war will always show a war became inevitable. As a historical fact and theological reality the criteria for judging a war is whether you win or lose.
Iraq2 was clouded by circumstances of kindergarden behavior. My thoughts may well not be yours. Bush, are now just hiding out and biding their time until the next time someone like George W. The argument that the goal is worthy and that war is the best option for pursuing it should be strong enough to garner considerable domestic and international support.
Sometimes you have to act. They are not, and never will be, existential threats to the USA. What, therefore, would make a war moral, or immoral?In this debate, Jan Ting, professor of law at Temple University, and Bryan Caplan, professor of economics at George Mason University, discuss whether war is ever justified.
Prof. Ting argues that while war should be a last resort, there are occasions where the consequences of not going to war outweigh the costs of war. If we could all agree all humanity that war is not justified, then there would be no need for it. We could all just meet in the town square over coffee and settle our differences.
War can be justified when: The cause of war is just i.e freedom or equality. Not going to war would cause more suffering than the war itself.
The war is started in self defense. War is not a good entry for peace building, for any war to be justified there should be some degree of morality in which the wars are fought.
Fighting with dignity includes treating our enemy well during and after the battle, treating war prisoners humanely and not targeting innocent people, which in this case is not possible. I do believe that war is not justified at all and it is not necessary.
2. As Saddam Hussein's actions during the Gulf War made clear, he was deterrable.
(The fact that after the invasion he was found to possess no weapons of mass destruction provides further, retrospective justification of this view.) This means that war was not undertaken as a last resort.
3. Just war theory (Latin: jus bellum iustum) is a doctrine, also referred to as a tradition, of military ethics studied by military leaders, theologians, ethicists and policy makers.
The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just.Download